Connect with us

Movies

Could Laurel and Hardy have been Laurel and Charlie Chaplin? – The Feud | Celebrity News | Showbiz & TV

CHANNEL TODAY BROADCASTING CORPORATION

Published

on


Stan Laurel and Charlie Chaplin fell out over fame

Stan Laurel and Charlie Chaplin fell out over fame (Image: Getty)

They remain, without doubt, two of the most famous British film comedians of all time, known worldwide for their hilarious slapstick antics. Londoner Charlie Chaplin and Lancastrian Stan Laurel not only sailed to America before the First World War in search of fame, but were close friends who roomed together for three years.

But while both found stardom, Chaplin with his Little Tramp persona and Laurel with his US comedy partner Oliver Hardy, the teenage friends fell out and never spoke again. So how and why did they fall out? The story of the two legendary comics has recently been examined on stage in a touring show, Laurel & Chaplin: The Feud.

It’s likely Chaplin’s meteoric rise to fame after meeting actor, director and studio boss Mack Sennett whose Keystone Studios in LA gave him his early break is to blame.

“They worked together and shared rooms but, after Chaplin joined Mack Sennett, that was it,” explains writer and producer of The Feud, Jon Conway. “There is no known record of them ever meeting again. So I wanted to find out more.”

Both Stan Laurel and Charlie Chaplin came from performing backgrounds.

Stan laurel and Oliver Hardy

Comedy duo Stan laurel and Oliver Hardy (Image: Getty)

Laurel’s father Arthur Jefferson was an actor and theatre-manager, while Chaplin’s parents were both on the stage. But their upbringings were very different.

Laurel’s family weren’t wealthy but comfortably off. Chaplin by contrast was brought up in extreme poverty. His early years were spent in and out of grim Victorian workhouses and institutes for destitute children.

This harsh Dickensian childhood gave Chaplin a sense of insecurity which he never lost. By the time he was 10 he was regularly performing on stage in a clog-dancing ­company. Chaplin and Laurel – then going under the name of Stanley Jefferson – joined theatre impresario Fred Karno’s pantomime troupe, performing comedy sketches in music halls up and down the country.

Laurel described himself as Chaplin’s understudy, but in fact everyone had to be able to cover for each other. In September 1910, the two friends set sail with the other Fred Karno ­players for a tour of North America, ­the converted cattle ship they were on first ­calling in Montreal, Canada. Chaplin in particular was determined to make his mark.

Laurel later recalled how, on sight of land, his friend dashed to the boat’s railings ­crying: “America! I am coming to conquer you! Every man, woman and child shall ­ have my name on their lips! Charles Spencer Chaplin!”

Simon Louvish, author of Stan And Ollie: The Roots Of Comedy, says: “As he was addressing the shoreline of Quebec rather than the US, we can imagine young Stanley standing by, puzzled, perhaps scratching his head in what would become a world famous quirk.”

While reviews of Karno’s shows were mixed, Chaplin as lead performer was ­singled out for special praise. Laurel soon left the tour to return to England but, finding little success back home, went on a ­second tour of America with Karno in 1912.

It was then that Chaplin was head-hunted by the film producer Sennett and his Keystone Studios company and made an offer he couldn’t refuse. Laurel hoped that, with Chaplin gone, he would now replace him in the lead role, but he was passed over.

Meanwhile, Chaplin soon became a huge star in the new medium of silent films. This became the cause of the falling-out. Laurel claimed that Chaplin had vowed that if he did strike it lucky in Hollywood he wouldn’t forget his old room-mate and would offer him a ­helping hand. But none was forthcoming.

Bizarrely, Laurel didn’t receive a single mention in Chaplin’s 500-page ­autobiography. While, in a letter, auctioned in 2017, he described his former friend Chaplin as “mean and cheap” and claimed the star showed “signs of insanity”. In a 1957 letter, Laurel wrote: “He [Chaplin] never to my knowledge ever had any time for any of his close friends who worked with him in the early days.

“I was closely associated with Charlie for two or three years. I was his understudy and shared rooms with him on many occasions, so am fully aware of his idiosyncrasies.”

He added: “He was a very eccentric character, composed of many moods, at times signs of insanity, which I think developed further when he gained fame and fortune.”

Chaplin and Laurel bound for North America and stardom in 1910

Chaplin and Laurel bound for North America and stardom in 1910 (Image: Getty)

A man with a tremendous libido, Chaplin confessed to having slept with more than 2,000 women. “Procreation is nature’s principal occupation, and every man, whether he be young or old, when meeting every woman, measures the potentiality of sex between them,” he wrote.

In addition to numerous affairs, he fathered 11 children with four different wives and had a particular penchant for much younger women – three of his wives being teenagers at the time of marriage. His acrimonious divorce from his second wife, actress Lita Grey, whom he is thought to have seduced when she was just 15, led to a then record settlement ­
of £625,000.

Chaplin could ­have faced imprisonment on charges of ­sex with a minor and, with his career threatened by the scandal, marriage to Grey was the only way out.

But while he was a shameless womaniser, who at times treated his lovers shabbily, in his defence, he was usually loyal to those who worked for him. He tended to have the same team for most of his films. And when his old mentor Fred Karno went bankrupt and came to the US, Chaplin did his best ­ to assist him.

“I think jealousy came into it,” says Jon Conway. “Chaplin was jealous of Laurel and saw him as a rival. Also, he very much wanted to leave his old life in England behind. He wanted to reinvent himself ­ in America.”

In the end, despite their rift, both ­­Chaplin and Laurel achieved success they could only have dreamt of when they were teenagers, rooming together in seedy ­boarding houses.

As the Little Tramp, Chaplin became the most recognisable man in the world, more famous than any king, emperor or politician. The one-time workhouse inmate became fabulously wealthy, signing a contract worth $1million in 1918.

The biggest name in silent comedy, the multi-talented Chaplin went on to star in, direct and also compose the music for a number of cinematic classics.

In 1940, in his first full sound film, ­­he ­lampooned Adolf Hitler in The Great Dictator, the film ending with a stirring ­anti-war monologue regarded by many as the greatest speech made in any film.

A global celebrity of his age, Chaplin met with and befriended leading political figures such as Winston Churchill and Mahatma Gandhi.

Yet after the war, the man who played ­ the Little Tramp found himself at the ­ centre of controversy again when his “progressive” political views fell foul of the US authorities and he was accused of Communist sympathies. Banned from America, he moved to Switzerland where ­he finally found contentment with his fourth wife, Oona.

Knighted in 1975, Sir Charles Chaplin died on Christmas Day 1977, aged 88, and the world mourned a genius. ­ And once his one-time understudy Stan Laurel teamed up with Oliver Hardy in 1927 he ­too became an international star and a very rich man.

Matt Knight and Jordan Conway as Laurel and Chaplin on stage

Matt Knight and Jordan Conway as Laurel and Chaplin on stage (Image: )

They made 106 films together, including 27 full-length sound features, among them ­classics such as Way Out West and A Chump At Oxford, in which Stan receives a bump on the head and is mistaken for the great scholar Lord Paddington.

Regarded as the funniest and most influential double act of all time, Stan and Ollie, like Chaplin, enjoyed global appeal, with their slapstick antics still enjoyed by millions of viewers today.

They made their last film together in 1951, and their last public appearance four years later. In 1957, Hardy died and Laurel, who had been ill himself, made it clear it was the end of the road ­ for him too. “What is there to say? He was like a brother to me. This is the end of the history of Laurel and Hardy,” he told the press.

Like his former friend Chaplin, Laurel had a complicated love life. He was also married four times, including twice to the same woman. Suffering from cancer, he died in February 1965 aged 74. Now here’s an interesting thought. Without the fall-out, might it have been Laurel and Chaplin, instead of Laurel and Hardy?

All things considered, it was probably for the best that the two men took different paths. That way we got double the laughs.



Source link

Movies

Advait Chandan And Dharma Productions Amicably Part Ways Over Dostana 2 Creative Differences

CHANNEL TODAY BROADCASTING CORPORATION

Published

on



Director Advait Chandan and Dharma Productions have decided to part ways on Dostana 2, sources told NDTV.

Chandan had been attached to direct the latest version of the project and spent close to seven months developing the film before both sides mutually decided to move in different directions.

According to sources, the decision was driven by creative differences, with the filmmaker and the studio envisioning different approaches for the franchise. However, sources emphasised that the separation was entirely amicable.

“Yes, Advait was initially set to direct the film, but he and Dharma Productions eventually decided to part ways. The decision was driven by creative differences, as their respective visions for the franchise did not align. The separation was entirely amicable, and there is no bad blood between him and Karan. All is well between them,” a source told NDTV.

The latest development adds another chapter to the long journey of Dostana 2, the sequel to Dharma Productions’ 2008 hit Dostana. The film was first announced in 2019 with Kartik Aaryan, Janhvi Kapoor and Lakshya in the lead. Collin D’Cunha was set to make his feature directorial debut with the project, but that version was eventually shelved.

Dharma Productions later began work on a fresh version of the film. Industry sources had indicated that the reworked project was expected to star Vikrant Massey and Lakshya, with former Miss India World Sini Shetty being considered for the female lead.

Chandan subsequently came on board to helm the project and had been working closely on its development over the past several months. The collaboration had generated considerable interest within the industry, especially given the filmmaker’s track record with films such as Secret Superstar, Laal Singh Chaddha and most recently Loveyapa.

Sources say discussions around the film’s creative direction eventually led to both parties arriving at the decision to pursue separate paths. There is, however, no acrimony surrounding the move.

Dharma Productions is expected to continue developing the project and is likely to begin the search for a new director. Despite its multiple reinventions over the years, Dostana 2 remains one of the studio’s most anticipated projects, largely because of the popularity of the original film and the curiosity surrounding its eventual revival.

ALSO READWhat’s Next For Farhan Akhtar After The Don 3 Fallout With Ranveer Singh?




Source link

Continue Reading

Movies

He Thanked Me For Our Support

CHANNEL TODAY BROADCASTING CORPORATION

Published

on



New Delhi:

A week after issuing a non-cooperation directive against Ranveer Singh, the Federation of Western India Cine Employees (FWICE) has now withdrawn the directive. 

Following this development, Poonam Dhillon revealed that Ranveer’s father personally reached out to thank her for publicly supporting the actor during the controversy. The actress, who is also the President of the Cine & TV Artistes’ Association (CINTAA), shared that the family was deeply appreciative of the solidarity shown by members of the film industry. 

In an interview with Variety India, Poonam Dhillon said, “As an actor and as the President of CINTAA, I’m happy that they’ve revoked the directive because he definitely didn’t deserve it. We opposed it from the beginning because FWICE had absolutely no credibility to take such action against an actor of his caliber.” 

She added, “As an actor, he has the right to choose his work, and it is between him and the producer how they handle the matter. He is responsible and committed to his work, and we have seen that through his body of work.”

Poonam Dhillon pointed out Ranveer’s longstanding professional relationship with Excel Entertainment through films such as Gully Boy and Dil Dhadakne Do. 

“As far as I know, he has an excellent relationship with Excel Entertainment, with whom he has made films like Gully Boy and Dil Dhadakne Do. Farhan Akhtar is also an actor, so our support extends to him as well. We wouldn’t want any of our actors to face such issues. Problems can always be resolved. We support Ranveer because he is a member of CINTAA,” she mentioned. 

Poonam Dhillon shared that she had a lengthy discussion with Jagjit Singh Bhavnani, Ranveer Singh’s father, following the resolution of the matter. 

The actress said, “I spoke to Ranveer’s father at length and we have been corresponding on WhatsApp. He thanked me for our support. We spoke to understand the situation better. He told me they had been in touch with Excel Entertainment and spoke about how close he is to Farhan and the entire Excel team. There is no animosity from his side. They were unhappy with the way FWICE handled the matter.”

She added, “I asked whether CINTAA could be of any help, but he said, ‘We didn’t involve you because we didn’t want to trouble you, and we’re already in the process of sorting it out.’ Technically, he didn’t need our intervention. I’m glad the matter has been resolved positively.”

Ranveer Singh made headlines after reportedly exiting Don 3, with Excel Entertainment seeking Rs 45 crore for pre-production losses and prompting an FWICE non-cooperation notice. With the directive now revoked, the dispute seems to be heading toward a resolution.




Source link

Continue Reading

Movies

‘Didn’t Know How To Deal With This’

CHANNEL TODAY BROADCASTING CORPORATION

Published

on



New Delhi:

Actor Priya Bapat, who has carved her niche over the years in Marathi cinema and the Hindi streaming space, recently opened up about a deeply uncomfortable experience on set when she wasn’t sure about a kissing scene from the very beginning.

What’s Happening

  • Priya Bapat told Filmfare, “This was kind of my first, first films. This is all before City of Dreams and everything happened. And there was only one kiss in the film. And I had concerns and doubts about it right from the script-reading sessions.”
  • She continued, “And I was continuously asking the director, why do you need it here? It’s not about whether I want to kiss or not. But it’s just about… how do you justify it? How do you justify? It just doesn’t fit here.”
  • The actress explained how she agreed to do the kissing scene as a way to get over her inhibitions and complete what was needed for the film.

When Things Started Getting Uncomfortable

Priya Bapat revealed that things started getting out of hand when her co-actor began improvising the intimate scene, beyond what was originally rehearsed.

She said, “And then there were moments where the actor kept improvising in the song. And he kept kissing me. And me being, I don’t know why, I didn’t take a stand for myself at that point of time. Because I didn’t know how to deal with this.”

It did not stop there. Priya Bapat further revealed that the co-actor made personal advances beyond the film set, failing to take the hint that she was not interested. She also felt helpless because they were staying in the same hotel, in different rooms. He kept persisting to meet up for breakfast or dinner, despite her continuous rejections.

How Priya Bapat’s Husband Handled The Situation

Priya Bapat said she felt so uneasy about what was going on that she would call her husband, Umesh Bhagat, and confide in him every night.

This led to him taking a flight from Mumbai to Bhopal, where the shoot was taking place, and not leaving her side for three days. She reiterated that this was the only time she has ever experienced such a thing.

About Priya Bapat

Priya Bapat is a well-known Marathi actress who has also had successful projects in the OTT space. She is most popular for the film Kaksparsh and the OTT series City of Dreams.

Some of her other notable projects include Happy Journey (2014), Aamhi Doghi (2018) and, quite recently, the SonyLIV series Raat Jawaan Hai.

ALSO READHina Khan’s Note To PM After Shilpa Shinde Took A Dig At Her Cancer Battle: ‘Release Criminals’




Source link

Continue Reading

Trending