Connect with us

Top Stories

Dame Esther’s petition gives MPs 200,000 reasons to end cruel assisted dying ban | UK | News

Avatar photo

Published

on


MPs have been given 200,000 reasons to “listen to the voice of the people” and end the cruel ban on assisted dying, Dame Esther Rantzen has said.

A petition started by the Daily Express surged past the latest signature milestone after becoming the most popular on the Government’s official website.

It has already secured a landmark debate which will put the issue in the political spotlight at Westminster Hall on Monday, April 29.

Dame Esther, 83, said: “This petition shows 200,000 reasons why it is time for MPs to listen to the voice of the people. Sadly I won’t be able to attend next week’s debate but I’ll be watching from home.

“Although the debate can’t change the law, I hope that so many powerful voices will take part that the Government will be forced to pay attention and make time for this life-and-death issue to be thoroughly investigated.

READ MORE: Assisted dying debate must move to how law will change, MND campaigner says

Thanksgiving Service In Memory of Dame Vera Lynn

Thousands have backed Dame Esther’s call for greater end of life choice (Image: Getty)

“So many of us feel that the current law is cruel and must be changed.”

The Daily Express Give Us Our Last Rights crusade, launched two years ago, is leading calls for a change in the law to allow assisted dying for terminally ill adults.

It received a major boost when Dame Esther bravely revealed she had registered with Dignitas in Zurich, Switzerland, following her diagnosis of stage four lung cancer.

Thousands have since rallied to back her call for the right to die and, earlier this week, the Childline founder joined a private meeting with the Express and MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who will open the petition debate.

Dame Esther, a lifelong campaigner, revealed she was surprised by the outpouring of support she received after speaking about her situation in December.

She said: “When I mentioned it in a podcast, I had no idea it was going to get the traction it did. It just seemed to resonate with so many people.

“The fact that the Express and Dignity in Dying picked it up is a reflection of the fact that as you get older, and circumstances mean that you witness or know of the deaths of people close to you, you become aware that as wonderful as palliative care can be, it doesn’t always create the sort of pain-free dignified death.

“When it doesn’t work and people are longing to die and say so to those around them, and everybody is helpless and can’t give them what they most want, then that becomes the abiding memory.”

Dame Esther's daughter Rebecca Wilcox

Dame Esther’s daughter Rebecca Wilcox has joined her battle (Image: Jonathan Buckmaster)

Fear that her family would be left with horrific memories of her final days and hours led her to contact the Swiss assisted dying clinic, Dame Esther explained.

She added: “If those you love, their last memory of you is you struggling, in pain, in acute discomfort with a loss of dignity, maybe asking to be helped to die, that memory acts as a barrier to all the positive memories.

“It’s not how I want my loved ones to remember me. That undoes for me the joy of having a family that I’ve had so many happy times with, if all they can remember is the pain.”

However, the grandmother-of-five’s plans were dealt a blow when she realised her family would risk prosecution if they accompanied her.

“I signed up to Dignitas and then discovered that they couldn’t come with me,” she said. “Even if I could afford the air fares for all of us, it would put them at risk of a police investigation – even though I’m not known for keeping my views quiet.”

The meeting was part of Ms Antoniazzi’s research ahead of the crucial debate. The Welsh Labour MP also opened the last Westminster Hall debate on assisted dying on July 4 2022.

David Minns and his son Matt Ryan

The Express campaign launched in 2022 with the story of David Minns and his son Matt (Image: Phil Harris)

Then, Ms Antoniazzi broke down in tears as she read heartbreaking stories of people who suffered indignity at the end of their lives.

She shared examples including the case of Gareth Ward, whose father Norman shot himself in the head when life with terminal prostate cancer became unbearable.

Dame Esther said it was important that the voices of people like Gareth – who have been forced to watch loved ones suffer – are heard later this month.

The That’s Life! presenter added: “Painful though it is, if we can actually describe what it’s like watching someone die in agony, someone you love who is asking for assistance and is being denied it, that’s what people need to understand.”

Arguments against assisted dying were also discussed. Opponents often say that if palliative care were improved in the UK then assisted dying would not be needed.

But Dame Esther said it was clear that “the best palliative care in the world cannot give everyone a pain-free, dignified death”.

She urged medics to read a recent Commons Health Select Committee report which found that the introduction of assisted dying in other countries had often come with improvements to end-of-life care.

“We aren’t criticising palliative care practitioners – we need them and we value them,” Dame Esther said.

“But the fact is that it’s not possible always to give people the death that they choose themselves.

“We believe that assisted dying being legalised under these circumstances would strengthen what they do, their very important branch of medicine.

“I know that some doctors say, ‘I don’t want to do this. This is not what I trained to do’. Just as we, the patients, should be given the choice, doctors should have the choice.”

Dame Esther paid tribute to other public figures, including actress Diana Ring, who spoke out around the same time she did.

And she revealed that of the deluge of messages she received, only one opposed her decision and said assisted dying was a crime for religious reasons.

She said: “If your religion precludes you having an assisted death, or for any reason you oppose it, that’s your choice.

“All we’re asking is that people who make a different choice should also be allowed to have the death that they wish.”

Repeating her demand for MPs to be given a free vote on the issue, the broadcaster urged politicians to “respond as human beings, and think about their own loved ones, their parents, their children”.

She added: “If they had a terminal illness which caused them such intense pain they wanted to die, what would it be like to be prevented from giving them the pain-free death they’re begging for?”

Ms Antoniazzi told Dame Esther the debate was sure to be a “pivotal moment”. She added: “I feel very strongly because I’m probably of a similar age to your daughter and my mother has been very unwell.

“I hope that it has been good for your family to be able to talk about it. One of the things we do need to talk about as a society is dying – we don’t do it well enough.”



Source link

Top Stories

Legal notice seeks withdrawal of ACC official’s graft remarks on Asif Mahmud

Avatar photo

Published

on


National Citizen Party (NCP) Spokesperson and former Youth and Sports Adviser to the interim government, Asif Mahmud Shojib Bhuyain, has sent a legal notice to Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) Deputy Director and Public Relations Officer Akhtarul Islam, demanding withdrawal of his remarks that “preliminary truth” was found in graft allegations against him.

In a message sent to the media on Friday, the NCP said Akhtarul Islam, at a press briefing on September 2, claimed that preliminary evidence supported allegations of irregularities in transfers, recruitment and promotions during Asif Mahmud’s tenure as adviser.

The remarks were widely circulated by various media outlets and on social media afterwards, it said.

The party alleged that the statement, made without any formal investigation or concrete evidence, triggered what it said was a large-scale media trial against Asif Mahmud, creating a public perception that the allegations were already proven and damaging his personal and political reputation.

According to the NCP, Akhtarul Islam later sent a message to journalists in a WhatsApp group for ACC beat reporters, saying his earlier remarks were made “by mistake” and requesting that the phrase “preliminary truth” be dropped from news coverage.

However, the party noted that the statement made at the public press conference was never formally withdrawn or corrected, allowing the resulting media trial and negative public perception to persist.

The legal notice also pointed out factual inconsistencies in the allegations. While the ACC official claimed 38 upazila youth development officers were stripped of their current charge, the NCP said the actual number was 112 and that the decision was implemented as part of enforcing an Administrative Appellate Tribunal order.

The party further said linking Asif Mahmud to the promotion of 150 assistant upazila youth development officers to upazila youth development officers was baseless, noting he resigned as adviser on December 10, 2025, while the promotions were made on May 11, 2026, five months after his resignation and three months into the BNP-led government’s tenure.

The notice calls on the ACC official to unconditionally withdraw his remarks within 15 days and refrain from making unverified, unsubstantiated statements in the future.

It warns that failure to comply will result in legal action, including under Section 500 of the Penal Code, which deals with defamation.





Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

California enacts new curbs on social media for children

Avatar photo

Published

on


OpenAI has said it intends to strengthen ChatGPT’s safeguards.

Reuters

11 September, 2026, 10:10 am

Last modified: 11 September, 2026, 10:13 am

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks as he meets voters and local leaders while campaigning for Democrats ahead of mid-term elections in Aiken, South Carolina, US, 4 September, 2026. Photo: Reuters

“>
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks as he meets voters and local leaders while campaigning for Democrats ahead of mid-term elections in Aiken, South Carolina, US, 4 September, 2026. Photo: Reuters

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks as he meets voters and local leaders while campaigning for Democrats ahead of mid-term elections in Aiken, South Carolina, US, 4 September, 2026. Photo: Reuters

California Governor Gavin Newsom on Thursday signed into law new restrictions barring children under 16 from exposure to behaviourally addictive features on social media platforms and banning toys containing AI companion chatbots.

The two measures were among 13 bills Newsom enacted as part of a package aimed at safeguarding young people from technologies seen as posing risks to their wellbeing, including measures to strengthen online privacy protections for minors.

Another measure expands criminal sanctions for child sexual abuse material to include digitally altered or AI-generated content depicting anyone under 18 engaged in sexual conduct.

A separate law bans the manufacture and sale of toys incorporating companion chatbots for the next four years. A related measure requires parental controls for chatbot programmes, along with other safety measures and risk assessments.

Newsom described the regulations as the most far-reaching of their kind in the US.

One of the measures, dubbed “Adam’s Law”, was named in memory of Adam Raine, a 16-year-old boy who died by suicide in April 2025. His parents said he acted on suicidal thoughts that were validated during months of conversations with OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

OpenAI has said it intends to strengthen ChatGPT’s safeguards. The company has acknowledged that its safeguards became “less reliable” as user interactions grew more prolonged.

“We want our children – and every California kid – to grow up in a world where technology supports their wellbeing, rather than exploits their vulnerabilities,” Newsom, a Democrat, said in a statement announcing the measures.

California, home to major technology companies including Google, Meta Platforms and Snap, joins a growing list of US states cracking down on business strategies seen as deliberately designed to keep teenagers engaged on social media, despite evidence linking extensive use to mental health risks.

The measures have received broad bipartisan support, although some critics have opposed them as unnecessary restrictions on young people’s internet access. The Electronic Frontier Foundation called the legislation “a massive privacy and free speech nightmare”.

Utah was the first US state to adopt laws regulating children’s access to social media. It was followed by states including Arkansas, Louisiana, Ohio, Texas, Florida and New York, although their approaches have varied.

‘Psychologically exploitative’ features targeted

Countries around the world have also moved to restrict children’s access to harmful online content. Australia, for example, has banned social media use by children under 16.

California’s version, known as Assembly Bill 1709, prohibits children under 16 from being exposed to a range of “psychologically exploitative features intended to maximise engagement that foreseeably lead to compulsive use”.

These include infinite-scroll feeds, algorithmic autoplay and other features to be defined through future regulations.

The law comes as Big Tech companies, facing mounting legal challenges, have shown greater willingness to accept new restrictions.

Meta agreed three weeks ago to pay as much as $18 billion over the next decade and impose strict limits on how teenagers use its Facebook and Instagram platforms under a deal with nearly all US states to resolve civil claims that the company designed its social media platforms to addict children.





Source link

Continue Reading

Top Stories

63 foreigners held in Ctg as police probe suspected online scam, 187 devices seized

Avatar photo

Published

on


Police seized 131 mobile phones, 56 laptops, foreign currencies and casino-playing equipment during the raid in the city’s Khulshi area.

TBS Report

11 September, 2026, 12:35 am

Last modified: 11 September, 2026, 01:05 am

The arrested foreigners. Photo: Collected

“>
The arrested foreigners. Photo: Collected

The arrested foreigners. Photo: Collected

Police detained 63 foreign nationals in Chattogram’s Khulshi area yesterday (10 September) during a raid over allegations of running an illegal casino business.

The police operation was conducted at an eight-storey building on Road 4 of the Jalalabad Krishnachura Residential Area, said Mohammad Abdur Rahim, officer-in-charge (OC) of Khulshi Police Station.

The detainees include nationals of Laos, Pakistan, China, Vietnam and Nepal, he said.

Seized devices. Photo: Collected

“>
Seized devices. Photo: Collected

Seized devices. Photo: Collected

The building, covering the entire premises, was being searched by law enforcement agencies, he added.

Of the 63 detainees, 35 are from Laos, 21 from Pakistan, five from China, one from Vietnam and one from Nepal, according to police.

Among them, 41 are men, 21 are women, and one is a child.

Police seized 131 mobile phones and 56 laptops, bringing the total number of devices seized to 187. They also recovered foreign currencies and equipment used for casino games during the raid.

The OC told The Business Standard that it had not yet been confirmed whether the detainees were involved in online scamming or the alleged illegal casino business.

He also said police would examine information stored on the seized devices to identify those involved.

The CMP Cyber Crime Unit had been working on the matter for a long time, Abdur Rahim said.

The raid began around 3pm yesterday after police received information through a confidential source, he added.

Locals said they had noticed an increased movement of foreign nationals in the building over the past month.

The OC said police would provide details officially after the operation ends.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending