Top Stories
Royal fans speculate over family curse after they spot late Queen’s eerie outfit pattern | Royal | News

Several royal brides did not seem to have their “something blue” bring them luck if it came in the form of Queen Elizabeth II.
Eagle-eyed fans were left wondering whether the late monarch could have inadvertently cursed a series of royal couples after they spotted an eerie pattern she followed for several decades.
TikTok user stories_from_the_jewellery_box was the first to share their doubts when they posted a video highlighting how most of the weddings at which the late Queen had donned blue ended up in divorce.
The user noted she first wore a Norman Hartnell-designed turquoise silk taffeta gown paired up with a matching three-quarters sleeves bolero and hat for the wedding of her sister Princess Margaret to Antony Armstrong-Jones in May 1960.
The socialite princess and the photographer’s relationship became notoriously rocky by the mid-1960s but they remained married for 18 years after producing two children.
For all the latest on news, politics, sports, and showbiz from the USA, go to Daily Express US
The late Queen once again opted for a blue outfit to attend the wedding of her daughter, Princess Anne, to Mark Phillips in November 1973. She chose a royal blue skirt suit with matching accessories and white gloves.
The Princess Royal and her first husband welcomed their son Peter in 1977 and later their daughter Zara Tindall in 1981.
The pair remained married until April 1992, only a few months after a DNA showed Phillips had fathered a daughter with another woman in 1985.
Anne went on to marry Sir Timothy Laurence, a former commander in the Royal Navy with whom she had started a relationship as early as 1989.
Their affair became public knowledge after details of their private correspondence were leaked to the British press. They married in Scotland in December 1992.
Her late Majesty once more went for a blue outfit for what was then dubbed the wedding of the century between then-Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer in 1981.
While Diana’s iconic wedding gown remains the most-talked-about outfit of the day, the late Queen opted for a seasonally-appropriate light blue cocktail dress paired up with a classic string of pearls and gloves.
The marriage troubles Charles and Diana experienced in the final phases of their own marriage came to be known as the “War of the Waleses.”
After welcoming sons Prince William and Prince Harry in the early-1980s, their relationship grew colder and they both entered extra-marital affairs.
The animosity grew so bitter by the early 1990s that the late Queen is believed to have intervened directly and ordered they divorce.
Royal author Angela Levin said in 2020: “This was the monarch taking over, not so much the mother or the mother-in-law, saying, ‘I insist on a divorce. I see this as ridiculous, it’s not going to work with being separated.’ They had to divorce.”
Penny Junor argued Her late Majesty stepped in because Charles and Diana’s conduct – which included the controversial Panorama interview and Charles’s comments to reporter Jonathan Dimbleby – was dividing the country.
Junior said: “The monarchy was going through a really, really rocky time because monarchy is supposed to be all about unifying the country.
“What Charles and Diana were doing by being at war with one another was splitting the country.”
The last recorded occasion in which the late Queen chose a blue dress for a royal wedding was the nuptials of Prince Andrew and Sarah Ferguson in 1986
The periwinkle dress appeared to be perfectly coordinated with Elizabeth, the Queen Mother’s own floral ensemble.
But much like the previous three occasions, Andrew and Sarah’s wedding collapsed following the birth of their two daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.
The couple officially split in 1996 but has remained very close after choosing to continue raising their daughters together.
After the pattern emerged, royal fans admitted the coincidence was rather eerie – with TikTok user MariaVonBeaverHausen saying: “I think if the Queen showed up to my wedding wearing any hue of blue I’d cancel the wedding and have a grand party.”
Another user, Omwoolisa, wrote: “Why didn’t she just stop wearing blue dresses then?”
But others simply dismissed speculation of a curse, with VictoriaAstrida commenting: “No, no curse, no such thing.
“The divorce rates are probably more for royals, such a difficult situation, so much publicity.”
Top Stories
UAE to unlock billions of dollars for Iran Sources

Word of the move, which has not been previously reported, coincides with the final stages of broader negotiations between Tehran and Washington on ending the war
People ride past a mural depicting the late leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and the late Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on a street in Tehran, Iran, June 9, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
“>
People ride past a mural depicting the late leader of the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, and the late Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, on a street in Tehran, Iran, June 9, 2026. Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Highlights
- Two sources say at least $10 billion to be unlocked under deal
- First $3 billion tranche already sent, sources say
- Deal includes revived economic ties, source says
- UAE official says Gulf state aims to ease regional tensions
- Iran sought similar pact with two other Gulf states, source says
The United Arab Emirates has agreed to unlock billions of dollars for Iran, four sources said, in a tactical shift after weeks of Iranian attacks on the wealthy Gulf Arab state during the US-Israeli war with the Islamic Republic.
Word of the move, which has not been previously reported, coincides with the final stages of broader negotiations between Tehran and Washington on ending the war, talks that diplomats say could involve the release of tens of billions of dollars in Iranian oil revenues frozen in foreign banks under US sanctions.
Two regional sources told Reuters the UAE had agreed to release a total of $10 billion, more than $3 billion of which had already been delivered.
Two other sources with knowledge of the arrangement put the total funds involved at $20 billion, adding that the move had been agreed in return for a halt to Iranian attacks on the UAE.
One of the sources with knowledge of the arrangement also said a first tranche of $3 billion had already been made available.
Reuters could not establish whether the funds earmarked for the transfers belong to the UAE or originate in long-blocked Iranian accounts in the UAE banking system, or elsewhere.
The UAE foreign ministry issued a statement early on Saturday categorically denying reports of the transfer “including allegations concerning $3 billion”.
The UAE statement affirmed that these allegations are entirely false and unfounded, stressing that no frozen Iranian funds have been released, transferred or facilitated through the UAE.
The UAE statement did not provide any further specifics.
Earlier, when asked by Reuters to comment on the transfer, a UAE official said the country was trying to ease tension and foster peace.
“The UAE’s foreign policy is guided by promoting de-escalation and reducing tensions across the region, while advancing lasting peace and stability,” the official said. “The UAE supports efforts, including those undertaken by the United States, to protect the peoples of the region from the repercussions of conflict.”
Iran last attacked the UAE directly on 4 May
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the move.
In Washington, Vice President JD Vance said on Friday that funds would not be released to Iran for signing a deal with the US or attending a meeting, adding that the potential deal is structured to ensure that economic benefits would flow to Tehran if it meets its obligations.
There was no immediate response from Iranian authorities to a Reuters request for comment on the move.
None of the sources cited in this article would agree to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter.
The arrangement signals a striking pivot from the open animosity of UAE-Iran relations through much of the war, when Iranian attacks emptied Dubai’s hotels, drove some expatriates to flee and shook the reputation for safety that is central to the country’s position as a premier business hub.
One of the sources with knowledge of the arrangement said the move offered a way to help solve the conflict between the US and Iran without either side crossing its red line: Iran can claim it extracted compensation for war damages, Washington can insist it paid nothing, and Abu Dhabi obtains its own security and Dubai’s hub status, while framing the move as an investment in rebuilding regional trust.
The other source with knowledge of the arrangement said that in return for the disbursement, Iran would halt missile and drone attacks on the UAE, and there would be a rebuilding of bilateral ties, including intelligence sharing and economic cooperation.
The source added that Iran had approached at least two other Gulf Arab countries to make a similar arrangement.
The last known direct attack by Iran on the UAE was more than a month ago – a 4 May strike on the Gulf state’s Fujairah port on the Gulf of Oman.
The first source with knowledge of the arrangement said talks had started several weeks ago but quickened pace when officials of Iran’s powerful Revolutionary Guards visited Abu Dhabi last week to meet Sheikh Tahnoun bin Zayed al Nahyan, the UAE’s national security adviser and deputy ruler of Abu Dhabi, and stayed at his guest house.
That trip was followed by a visit by UAE officials to Tehran to negotiate the details of the mechanism.
Sizeable Iranian assets in Dubai
The UAE-Iranian arrangement is set to unfold against a complex financial backdrop potentially involving Dubai, the UAE’s main commercial hub and one of Tehran’s most critical economic lifelines.
Dubai’s banks have long held substantial Iranian-linked deposits, much of them now immobilised under US sanctions that police the global dollar-clearing system and expose any foreign bank dealing with blacklisted Iranian entities to being cut off from the American financial network.
On 11 April, a senior Iranian source said that the US had agreed to release Iranian frozen assets held in Qatar and other foreign banks, although a US official swiftly denied the assertion.
The source, who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter, told Reuters that unfreezing the assets was “directly linked to ensuring safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz”, a key issue in talks aimed at ending the conflict.
Top Stories
Iran says Elon Musk's business interests in Middle East are military targets


According to the state-affiliated Fars news agency, the designation includes SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet service and its regional ground stations
Source link
Top Stories
US and Iran signal a peace deal is close

The terms of the so-called memorandum of understanding include reopening the Strait of Hormuz and lifting the US blockade on Iranian ports, the US official told reporters, adding that the deal met President Donald Trump’s core objectives and put negotiations “in a very, very good place.”
Chess pieces are seen in front of displayed Iran’s and US flags in this illustration taken January 25, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
“>
Chess pieces are seen in front of displayed Iran’s and US flags in this illustration taken January 25, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
Summary
- Washington expects initial deal in coming days, US official says
- Pakistan PM says text of a deal has been finalised
- Trump calls reports of terms that favour Iran ‘fake news’
- Deal as outlined by Western, Iranian, Pakistani sources appears to match terms originally proposed by Tehran
- Western source says deal could be signed as soon as Sunday
The United States and Iran signalled yesterday (12 June) that an agreement to end their war was close, with a senior US administration official saying both sides had agreed on a text and that Washington expects to sign an initial deal in the coming days.
Iran’s decision-making bodies were meeting to discuss the memorandum, Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson said.
The terms of the so-called memorandum of understanding include reopening the Strait of Hormuz and lifting the US blockade on Iranian ports, the US official told reporters, adding that the deal met President Donald Trump’s core objectives and put negotiations “in a very, very good place.”
Leaked terms of the proposed memorandum outlined by Western, Pakistani and Iranian sources earlier yesterday appeared to favour Iran, drawing criticism from Trump, who dismissed the reports as inaccurate.
While there were minor differences in the accounts, all appeared to offer Tehran much of what it has demanded so far, with Trump appearing to win little of what he has sought beyond the reopening of the strait, which Iran shut after the US and Israel launched attacks in February.
The US official, however, said the agreement would ultimately lead to the dismantling of Iran’s nuclear programme, with its stockpile of highly enriched uranium to be destroyed and removed – a key US demand.
Trump also reposted comments by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, who said a memorandum to end the war had “never been closer.”
Pakistan, which has for weeks sought to broker a deal, said a final text had been settled upon. “Pakistan is now working closely with both sides to finalise the next steps,” Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said in a post on X.
WHAT’S IN THE DEAL?
Draft terms of the deal described to Reuters by multiple sources indicate that the US would immediately begin releasing billions of dollars in frozen Iranian assets and waive sanctions on its oil exports, in return for Iran opening the strait.
Discussion of Iran’s nuclear programme would be set aside for a 60-day period of talks on a final settlement, they said. The proposals include discussion of possible war reparations for Tehran and dropping longstanding US demands for limits on Iran’s missile programme, the sources said.
Washington has repeatedly demanded Iran give up its stockpile of highly enriched uranium. Another senior US official, describing the agreement, said the uranium stockpile “will be destroyed and removed” and Iran’s nuclear programme would be dismantled.
“None of their money released until they perform. Strait of Hormuz will be open. No Iran funding of terrorist groups,” the official said. “This is what they have agreed to. This is a performance-based deal.”
Vice President JD Vance said on X: “First, the Iranians are not receiving any cash, and no funds are being released for simply signing a deal or attending a meeting.”
The deal ensures economic benefits would only flow to Iran if it meets its obligations under the agreement, he said.
ISRAEL NOT PARTY TO MEMORANDUM
A Western source said that if language can be agreed, the memorandum could be signed as soon as Sunday by Vance and Iran’s parliament speaker, Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf, with Geneva seen as the likeliest venue.
The US administration official said Europe had been discussed as a venue for signing but no decision had been made.
Israel, which launched the war alongside the United States, has not been part of the negotiations. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his country would not be party to the memorandum.
Netanyahu has clashed with Trump in recent weeks over US demands that Israel curb military action in Lebanon to let Washington reach a deal with Tehran.
Israel’s defence minister said Israel would not withdraw from territory in Lebanon. A senior Israeli official said Israel expects under any deal to retain its freedom to act against what it deems threats in areas under its control.
OIL PRICE FALLS
The progress towards an agreement has emerged at the end of a week that brought a sharp escalation in hostilities in the Gulf, including Israeli-Iranian exchanges of fire and US strikes on Iranian targets, followed by retaliation against US bases.
Indications of a potential deal prompted global shares to rally and oil prices to slip. Brent crude prices were down more than 3% at their lowest in nearly two months.
The conflict has become a political headache for the White House, amid rising fuel prices and slipping approval ratings for Trump.
Some Republicans worry that the war’s unpopularity could cost them control of Congress in November’s midterm elections. But many Republicans hold hawkish positions on Iran and could have difficulty endorsing an agreement viewed as yielding concessions.
Tehran has always said its nuclear programme is peaceful and accepted tight curbs on it in return for the lifting of sanctions under a 2015 agreement with the administration of then-US President Barack Obama.
Trump abandoned that deal during his first term in 2018 and Iran responded by ramping up its enrichment of uranium, producing more than 400 kg (around 900 pounds) of material at close to the purity needed to make a bomb.
Business4 weeks agoProfit Surges 3.5x, Dividend Declared
Top Stories3 days agoIndia, Bangladesh border chiefs hold talks in New Delhi on security, border management
Sports1 week agoEderson to Man Utd announcement timeline as transfer agreement reached | Football | Sport
Video4 weeks agoবহুতল ভবনে যেভাবে ঝুলে কাজ করেন নির্মাণ শ্রমিকরা | Construction Workers | Protidiner Bangladesh
Video3 weeks ago🚨Rahul Gandhi on Fear, Power & Politics🚨 #shorts
Video3 weeks agoসন্ধ্যার বাংলাদেশ | Latest Bulletin | Sondhar Bangladesh | 7 PM | 05 May 2026 | Jamuna TV
Video4 weeks agoআন্তর্জাতিক সব খবর | Banglavision World News | 01 May 2026 | International News Bulletin
Video4 weeks agoThis U.K. Political Ad Just BLEW my Mind 🇬🇧






















